Francis Bacon and 3 Benefits of Chaos for Creatives
By Thea Fiore Bloom, PhD

“Everything was torn, everything was dirty, everything was … wonderful.”
That’s how art historian John Richard described his friend Francis Bacon’s studio.
Bacon (1909 -1992) is famous for his brooding portraits of popes, distorted triptychs and the occasional depiction of a slab of hanging meat.
But here are two things most people don’t know about Bacon:
1. Bacon was one of the top-earning artists of all time.
When Bacon died in 1992, his estate was worth over 20 million in today’s dollars.
In 2013, Christie’s sold Bacon’s “Three Studies of Lucien Freud” for the then-record-breaking price of $142.4 million.
That’s more than van Gogh’s “Portrait of Dr. Gachet”, Rothko’s “No. 10”, or Edvard Munch’s “Scream” fetched back then.
You and I probably didn’t become artists expecting payouts like that.
I only mention the money because it validates the second thing most folks don’t know about Bacon; it’s the thing I’m fascinated by.
And that’s this.
2. Francis Bacon had one of the most chaotic studios of all time.
I am suggesting here that the success of one of the greatest figurative painters of the 20th century was supported (not inhibited) by his explosively chaotic mess.
So, if you think your studio is bad, I want you to have a gander at Bacon’s.

You Think Your Art Studio is Bad? Look at Bacon’s
If you can see the image of Bacon’s studio here, let your eyes wander down to the floor.
You may notice it’s not a floor, per se.
Bacon’s floor was more like a landscape of Dixie cup mountains and magazine-page valleys.
After seeing Bacon’s floor, you may be thinking, ‘Man, I’m Marie Kondo compared to this guy.’
I smile when I think that Bacon didn’t apologize for his floor piles, desk piles, or wall piles.
In fact, he referred to them as necessary “compost” for future paintings.
As Michelle Doyle wrote in The Royal Academy UK:
“By the time Bacon died, his studio floor was feet-deep in thousands of photographs and magazines – a mix of high and low cultural images, historic paintings, scientific drawings and photographs as well as reproductions of his own work […]. These images are embedded in his paintings, from subtle hints, to direct references to the Old Masters, news, and current events.”
Bacon’s piles were vital to his process; in a 1991 interview with photographer Francis Gocobetti, Bacon said:
“Images […] help me find and realize ideas. I look at hundreds of very different, contrasting images and I pinch details from them, rather like people who eat from other people’s plates.”

Granted, most of us don’t want to work among mounds of moulding Dixie cups, but increasing our chaos tolerance, by even a smidge, can grant creatives like us big boons.
And we’ll get to three of them in one minute.
But first, want to hear a wild story about what happened to all those Baconian floor piles?
Let’s go.
The Story of Bacon’s Studio
After he died in 1992, Bacon’s divine river of chaos at 7 Reece Mews, South Kensington, in London, sat silent – for years.
It served only to house some very happy mice and spiders.
But in 1998, the visionary Irish curator Dr. Barbara Dawson secured the donation (from Bacon’s generous friend and sole heir, John Edwards) of everything in Francis Bacon’s extant studio.
I mean every single thing.

Curators tenderly tagged thousands of Bacon’s:
- Crusty paint tubes,
- Upended champagne boxes,
- Molding Dixie cups,
- The aged paneling he wiped his brushes on,
- The leaking skylight to his roof,
- His last finished work
- His rusty radiator,
- The canvases he slashed,
- The dangling bulb he worked by,
- Even the dust was bagged and carted away to be reassembled for posterity.
Dawson and her team then reassembled most of Bacon’s things into a permanent exhibition at the Hugh Lane Gallery in Dublin, Ireland, where you can see it today.
So let’s get back to the big benefits of embracing a little disorder for artists and writers like you and me.
3 Benefits of Chaos for Creatives, Inspired by Francis Bacon’s Studio

1st Benefit of Chaos for Creatives:
Permission to Roam
I love what Lithuanian artist/writer Ksenia Odintsova said about chaos:
“Creativity rarely starts from order. For many artists, the early stages of making — the sketches, the impulses, the fragments of ideas — feel chaotic and scattered. This chaos isn’t a flaw in the process; it is the process. The mind needs space to roam, collide with itself, and generate unexpected connections.”
Can we see our occasional struggle with chaos as part of our creative process, not a flaw in it?
Can we try to look at our own piles of paint tubes, magazines, and the occasional yellow rubber chicken in our studios, or on our desk, not as things to be ashamed of but as resources?
Resources that lead to our best ideas?
Which brings us to our second benefit.

2nd Benefit of Chaos for Creatives:
Chaos Births Meaning
Our brightest creative ideas often well up out of passionate disorder.
Odintsova also said:
“Artistic chaos is the raw material from which meaning emerges. Without dissonance or contradiction, the work risks becoming predictable, safe, or emotionally flat. Chaos is the moment before clarity, the spark that activates imagination.”
So bearing this in mind, your mound-y studio floor, or the thirty-three journals you are writing in at the same time, are nothing to be ashamed of, right?
They are simply part of the chaos piles you need to leave in your wake to get to your brightest idea.
Just like Bacon did.
Your brightest idea is often the one that leaves you giddy and excited to begin.
Our final benefit is great for folks like me who worry that if I give in to chaos, I will never transition out of it, never move towards completion.
“All painting is an accident.
But it’s also not an accident, because one must select what part of the accident one chooses to preserve.”
– Francis Bacon
3rd Benefit of Chaos for Creatives:
Chaos Can Equal Completion
Sometimes we fear that if we let too many juicy ideas swirl around, we won’t have the inner authority and felt sense to pick the right one.
But you will.
We also fear that if we relax into the chaos, if we celebrate it, if we enjoy the sensuality of squishing our fingers in paint without a purpose, cover our floor and walls with drips, or if we write stories we never even want to see the light of day, we will be found years later drooling into a cup.
But you won’t.
We worry that if we don’t clean up, we’ll never exit the chaos; we’ll never focus again; and we’ll be featured in some show about hoarders.
But the film crew isn’t coming, I promise.
As I get older, I see chaos as a necessary, nearly sacred threshold I must pass through before I can get anywhere near focus.
How about you?
Artist and writer Helen Wells posits creatives can come to peace with the chaos of creating when they see artmaking as a two-mode process.
Scatter then focus, says Wells.
Here’s what that means to me.
Scatter Then Focus
Step 1: Scatter/Expand
Scatter to celebrate chaos.
Scatter to birth your best ideas.
In other words, scatter to expand your wings-wide.
Only after that healthy, luscious expansion is it possible to focus.
Step 2: Focus/Contract
I see focus as an act of contraction.
Contract to select the one exciting project or series you would create right now if no one was watching.
If you’re excited to start, it will be easier to finish because you want to be there.
Like I tell my writing coaching clients who are having trouble focusing; expand fully, then contract.
But I don’t always listen to the advice I give clients.
For example, I know I should not edit material I haven’t had time to stretch out into and experiment with.
But I still edit it anyway.
That’s contracting before expanding.
And it makes for lackluster writing.
I hope you grant yourself the time to practice the courageous act of letting your unique, wild-wide-winged, voice out into a piece before you edit it.
Allow time for mess, accidents, and wonder, as Bacon did.
Only after the storm has passed is it time to select, polish, and refine.
Yes, it takes longer this way.
Yes, there’ll be more chaos this way.
But that chaos-informed project will include soul.
And I find I am far more likely to finish projects my soul resides in.
Conclusion
We don’t have to wade through empty champagne bottles to get to our easel as Bacon did.
But if our fairly organized desk or studio does get a bit hairy this year, can we remember Bacon’s passion and success and maybe lean into our creative wild a bit more?
Can you and I love our artist and writer selves more, deepen our dives into the unknown within and have more fun – before we clean up?
Can we overrule what the nuns or whoever told us about needing to be neat?
Because as Bacon’s life tells us, the job of the artist is not to be neat:
“The job of the artist is always to deepen the mystery.”- Francis Bacon
What do you think?
Question for you for the road;
1. What would it be like to grant your ideal, eclectic, often chaotic art-making process – the respect Bacon granted to his?
2. Do you allow paint on your studio floor yet?
Let me know in the comments.
I still don’t! I’m working up to it. But my tiny painting sink is paint-splooged.
Other Charmed Studio Posts You Might Like:
How To Get an Artist’s Residency? Don’t Apply For One, Do This Instead
How Well Do You Know Salvador Dalí? Discover His 6 Playful Art Marketing Secrets
Why Are Some Art Teachers So Mean? How To Blast Through Envy and Bloom as an Artist
Diane Arbus: 4 Little-Known Facts About Her Life That Can Make You a Better, More Successful Artist
13 Thrilling Artists’ Homes You Can Visit That Will Ignite Your Art or Writing Practice

This post may contain Amazon affiliate links. This means if you buy books or stuff via my blog I may receive a tiny commission and do a happy dance. There is no extra fee for you. I only link to items I personally use and love; products that I think help heart-centered artists.


Artist Brian Rutenberg is also very, very messy and says an art studio MUST be messy. I keep straightening this out, putting things in place as soon as I dont need them. I cannot think or create better when I am surrounded by mess. We cannot know the percentage of creativity allotted to the studio mess or Bacon’s talent. I will test this approach. If it helps me to be more open, more trusting of my creativity and have more and better ideas, I will throw in the towel.
Hi Bela,
Thanks for your thought-provoking comment.
Not every artist benefits from mess.
Artists like O’Keeffe, known for her clean lines, had a very clean studio.
As did Agnes Martin, Piet Mondrian, and Donald Judd.
But interestingly, all those artists enjoyed making, or were driven to make, “clean-lined” or minimalist work.
Now Henri Matisse, on the other hand, did have a looser style and worked on a massive scale, but he, like you, preferred an orderly environment where he could step back and see his work without much distraction.
You do you, I say.
I do honor your desire to experiment with mess, though.
Experiments are great, because there is no failure, just information.
It’s brave to move toward something that makes us uncomfortable, yet we also feel may hold growth potential for us.
And your comment made me reflect.
Ultimately, I would say it is PERMISSION, not mess necessarily, that results in us doing the best work of our lives.
For many of us, that permission comes in the form of permission to make a mess.
For others, perhaps others like you, we grant ourselves permission in other ways.
Perhaps granting yourself swaths of time?
Any thoughts on what more permission you’d like to grant yourself in your studio that does not involve mess or chaos?
Thea, thanks for responding to my comments. I may not have mentioned that I feel my studio is indeed messier than I would like due to lack of space. I wonder if my work would be more abstract expressionistic if the mess were more intentional…. As for your question, the permission I always strive to give myself – with not enough success – is to paint what comes, without second-guessing, without wondering what curators or “those who know” would think. Am I building a cohesive body of work while giving myself permission to experiment? An Oscar recipient once told us (my husband and myself, visiting him) that he composes one score for others and one for himself. I suppose that even without doing that intentionally, the painting that comes out as a runt of the litter can be put aside as “for myself”. No harm done.
Yes! I relate totally to what you are saying, and I bet so many other artists do too.
I know I have a constant struggle as I make my assemblage art. I struggle to make what I am curious and passionate about -versus making art that I think might be well reviewed, accepted, or that will sell.
But when i make work similar to work sold in the past, it usually does not sell, because the curiosity and passion are no longer present in the process. The energy no longer lives within the piece, because I made it with no energy. I made it for the “star chamber” judges within my head.
Ironically, I have found when I make what I want to make instead of what I should make, the work ends up being much better received in the long run. Because when I allow myself a trial-and-error process, where I get to experiment madly and make tons of awkward cr@p, and keep making the series anyway, eventually the duds die away and new pieces evolve out of the initial awkwardness stage and evolve into a breakthrough that people seem to gravitate more toward than my safer work.
But the key for me is to give myself permission to persist, and not cancel the mission when the initial pieces come out like cr@p.
Does that make sense to you or any other artists out there?
PS It would be interesting to look at photos of artists’ studios in real time, without any tidying, and without any paintings present, and see if we could pick out the abstract expressionists by analyzing splatter,”clutter” and other as-of-yet-unnamed clues 🙂
Another really great podcast Thea. I would if I could upload an affirming photo of my studio at this moment.
(Disastrous)
So it’s wonderful to commiserate and laugh, thank you!
Leigh! I would love to see the photo; maybe email it to me if you get a second. I wish images could be attached to the comments here, but this WordPress site does not permit it. I would love to make a digital or physical gallery of real artists’ workspaces, like yours. Spaces where REAL women and men create.
Viva la resistance!
Very kind of you to take the time to comment, glad I could make you laugh. And help you turn down the pressure on yourself.
Your art is sublime, who cares what the area it is born from looks like.
Ok more later, my laundry mounds are invading the bedroom, and must be slain.
Thanks for the photo! What a wonderful workplace you have created. A bunch of artists have been sending me images, this is one of the very few times in my life I wish for 5 minutes, that I was on social media. Because I would like to create a gallery (with all your permissions) so you can see each other’s real-deal, lovely, workspaces.
My personal chaos is not quite as bad as Bacons. But I am a notebook , journal, planbook and sketchbook hoarder. I have tried to to keep my writings organized into their own notebook , etc. But whenever I get the urge to draw or write I tend to pick up the nearest notebook. I have 3 painting stations. If I am working a station A , I need to go to station B to find a paint tube. I know what you are thinking- have 3 tubes of each color- one for each station. Tried that. Ended up with three tubes of the same color at one station!
Elise, I literally chortled, actually laughed out loud even, at your wonderful story about the 3 paint tubes of the same color at one station, because man, I relate.
I now have 3 desks set up all over the house for writing, (one tiny, one small, one large; it’s a Goldilocks thing) and the funny thing is, when I really need to focus- I sit on the floor with a pencil.
Thanks for taking the time to tell me about how you work.
Your paintings are beautiful. I say, add another station, just for fun.
YOLO.
We recently read a fictional sci fi -adjacent book about Bacon by Tade Thompson. This post was the perfect pairing for that book! And boy-oh-boy did I ever need to hear that permission, nay, MANDATE to get messy! Yes, please! You always know just what we creatives need to hear!
So glad you liked the piece! That means a lot to me. I like your choice of words, “a Mandate to get messy.” Yes, lets take it on as a mandate. It’s not clutter, it’s a creative mandate. 🙂
Viva la resistance!
That Tade Thompson book sounds intriguing. Do you recommend it?
Bacon had a personal life right out of a novel. He knew and was fascinated by Ronnie and Reggie Kray, the notorious mob twin brothers, and perhaps the most dangerous and notorious gangsters in London.
Are they in the novel?
They broke into his studio once, and when Bacon arrived home he found them there. They were very friendly; Bacon didn’t know what to do, so he asked if they wanted tea. I bet they said yes.
The book is called Jackdaw. Though it was a fascinating read, it was really creepy and uncomfortable, as a writer becomes obsessed with Bacon’s life and begins to become him in a weird way. Let’s just say meat pinata and leave it there.
I don’t recall any mention of the Kray brothers, but there is a bit of an underworld element, so perhaps a nod to that?
Love your podcast, btw! It is a MUST LISTEN for creatives – all of the episodes!
No meat piñatas for me! Bacon definitely had a dance with violence that I don’t relate to. But it was near the center of much of his fascinations. Especially in his romantic relationships and even friendships. Thanks for letting me know about the book.
Forgot to add this, here is a great BBC documentary for any of you who want to discover more about the life of Francis Bacon.
https://youtu.be/rgYaTKH8L7M?si=DaszEUXcye6QwMP6